<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Art of Divorce: Family Law Resources</title>
	<link>http://artofdivorce.com</link>
	<description>Divorce Information</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Heather Mills - Fool for a Divorce Client</title>
		<link>http://artofdivorce.com/2008/02/11/heather-mills-fool-for-a-divorce-client/</link>
		<comments>http://artofdivorce.com/2008/02/11/heather-mills-fool-for-a-divorce-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>divorce help</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Divorce - General</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Property Division</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Celebrity Divorces</dc:subject><dc:subject>divorce lawyer</dc:subject><dc:subject>divorce proceedings</dc:subject><dc:subject>heather mills</dc:subject><dc:subject>paul mccartney</dc:subject><dc:subject>sir paul mccartney</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofdivorce.com/2008/02/11/heather-mills-fool-for-a-divorce-client/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a saying in law that the person who represents himself in court has a fool for a client. In this case, Heather Mills has decided to play the fool in her divorce proceedings with Sir Paul McCartney. Mills has apparently become estranged from her law firm, reportedly owes them millions of pounds in legal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://artofdivorce.com/2008/02/11/heather-mills-fool-for-a-divorce-client/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul McCartney Divorce Settlement Talks Collapse</title>
		<link>http://artofdivorce.com/2007/10/12/paul-mccartney-divorce-settlement-talks-collapse/</link>
		<comments>http://artofdivorce.com/2007/10/12/paul-mccartney-divorce-settlement-talks-collapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>divorce help</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Divorce - General</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Property Division</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Celebrity Divorces</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofdivorce.com/2007/10/12/paul-mccartney-divorce-settlement-talks-collapse/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Paul McCartney - Heather Mills divorce saga continues because the divorce settlement was never reached. Mills has been gold-digging for quite some time&#8230;a far cry in both taste and talent from the first wife. The property settlement talks have collapsed. Let&#8217;s see how much of McCartney&#8217;s billion-dollar plus fortune Mills can extract in court.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://artofdivorce.com/2007/10/12/paul-mccartney-divorce-settlement-talks-collapse/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dead Man Denied Divorce Decree</title>
		<link>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/07/26/dead-man-denied-divorce-decree/</link>
		<comments>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/07/26/dead-man-denied-divorce-decree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>divorce help</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>News</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Property Division</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofdivorce.com/2006/07/26/dead-man-denied-divorce-decree/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I previously wrote about the dentist who was murdered prior to the entry of his divorce decree. The judge has denied his attorney&#8217;s request to grant the decree after death, finding instead that the marriage ended with the man&#8217;s death. Property will be divided between his estate and his wife per a property settlement agreement [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/07/26/dead-man-denied-divorce-decree/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women Oppose California Divorce Privacy Law</title>
		<link>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/10/women-oppose-california-divorce-privacy-law/</link>
		<comments>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/10/women-oppose-california-divorce-privacy-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>divorce help</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Divorce - General</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Property Division</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/10/women-oppose-california-divorce-privacy-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key female legislators are attempting to kill California Senate Bill 1015. This is setting up a gender war in the state capitol.
The bill would require the redaction of financial and other private information if requested by either spouse.
Liberal women&#8217;s advocacy groups, such as the National Organization for Women, are opposing the bill on the grounds [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/10/women-oppose-california-divorce-privacy-law/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separate But Never Divorce?</title>
		<link>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/06/separate-but-never-divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/06/separate-but-never-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2006 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>divorce help</dc:creator>
		
	<dc:subject>Divorce - General</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject>Property Division</dc:subject>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/06/separate-but-never-divorce/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Illinois couple has signed a contract to permanently separate but never divorce. The husband and wife split their assets. It is doubtful that a court of law would enforce the contract if either spouse decided to get a divorce.
Hat tip to the Chicago Tribune for this story.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRSS>http://artofdivorce.com/2006/05/06/separate-but-never-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
